Scott, http://www.threemoviebuffs.com/review.php?movieID=inconvenienttruth, says he found Al Gore as a good speaker, his science to be sound and his personality was calm. Also he says the movie version of his presentation was not that much good, because of some reasons; one of these reasons was the central point of the movie doesn't seem to be about Global Warming. Another reason is because Al Gore related some of his life experience that doesn’t match with Global Warming; for example, when he related his sister who died; this was just to play with Scott’s emotions, as he said. Also there were some jokes on Bush and other republicans during the presentation.
Brain Orndorf, http://www.filmjerk.com/reviews/article.php?id_rev=837 , says that Gore has a point when he said most of the pollution and things that affect the earth are coming from people, and he relates his personal knowledge into a slide show in order to make his presentation much more attractive and interesting to the audience. Because global warming is an important subject to our life Gore decided to start back on the lecture circuit. “Inconvenient Truth” might not be acceptable by all the people, but it’s trying to do something good, and positive in a time when forward thinking always seems to be punished.
In my point of view I think what Scott said about “Inconvenient Truth” was wrong when he mentioned that Al Gore’s presentation wasn’t very good. I really disagree with this point because I found it very good quality and it was a great presentation and attractive. However I agree with Brain Orndorf when he said that the video to some people is acceptable and some not, but it’s trying to remind the people of how important global warming is.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment